Softr vs Noloco: Which No-Code Portal Builder is Best for You?

Thumbnail image for "Blogs" article

Table of contents

Introduction

Client portals and internal tools are no longer a nicety for today's agencies, freelancers, and teams. Whether it's managing client interactions or streamlining operations, having a branded, secure environment is no longer a nicety, it's a requirement.

The good news? No-code platforms have made it easier than ever to create such portals. Two of the strongest ones out there are Softr and Noloco

They share a lot in common but serve different user bases and project needs. Throughout this guide, we will help you compare how they match up and which one will work best for your use case.

What Is a No-Code Portal Builder?

A no-code portal builder lets you create secure, user-specific web applications without writing code. These platforms are typically used for:

  • Client portals with login access
  • Internal dashboards for teams
  • Membership sites or resource directories

Key features usually include:

  • User authentication
  • Data visibility by user role
  • File uploads, forms, task tracking, dashboards

Use cases range from agencies and consultants to SaaS companies and internal teams.

Quick Overview: Softr vs. Noloco

Feature Softr Noloco
Data Source Airtable, Google Sheets Airtable, Google Sheets, SQL
UI Style Modular, block-based Full UI editor + layouts
User Authentication Built-in (email/password, SSO) Built-in + advanced roles
Learning Curve Very beginner-friendly Slightly more advanced
Best For MVPs, client portals, directories Internal tools, CRMs, portals
Pricing Starts free, paid from $29/mo Free trial, paid from $49/mo
White Labeling On paid plans On paid plans
Mobile Responsiveness Excellent Good but requires tweaking

1. Ease of Use

Softr

Softr’s interface is simple, clean, and built for non-technical users. Its block-based editor makes it easy to drag and drop content like lists, forms, and charts without worrying about layout rules. It’s ideal for launching portals in hours, not days.

Noloco

Noloco offers more flexibility with its visual layout editor, but this power comes at a cost: a slightly steeper learning curve. It’s still beginner-friendly, especially with good onboarding, but offers more nuanced control over user flows and layouts.

Verdict: Softr wins for beginners and speed. Noloco wins for customization.

Criteria Softr Noloco
Ease of Use Simple, clean interface with a block-based editor. Great for non-technical users to launch portals quickly. More flexible visual editor with a slightly steeper learning curve. Better control over user flows and layouts.
Verdict: Softr wins for beginners and speed. Noloco wins for customization.

2. Data & Integration Support

Softr

Softr primarily connects with Airtable, with growing support for Google Sheets and HubSpot. It’s perfect for simple Airtable-based workflows but may fall short for complex business logic. Its Zapier and Make support helps bridge the gap for automation.

Noloco

Noloco supports Airtable, Google Sheets, and SQL databases, making it a better fit for complex use cases. With full API support, you can create dynamic views and workflows with tools like Slack, Twilio, and Webhooks.

Verdict: Noloco is best for advanced integrations and SQL users. Softr fits simpler, Airtable-based apps.

Criteria Softr Noloco
Data & Integration Support Connects primarily with Airtable, with growing support for Google Sheets and HubSpot. Works well for simple workflows. Supports automation via Zapier and Make. Supports Airtable, Google Sheets, and SQL databases. Strong API support for advanced workflows using Slack, Twilio, Webhooks, and more.
Verdict: Noloco is best for advanced integrations and SQL users. Softr fits simpler, Airtable-based apps.

3. User Roles & Permissions

Softr

Softr uses row-level security and basic visibility settings to personalize what each user sees. It’s easy to set up and works well for small teams or clients.

Noloco

Noloco offers fine-grained access control, enabling you to create complex permission layers by user group. You can even define approval workflows and custom roles.

Verdict: Noloco is better for teams with multiple user levels. Softr works well for simple client segmentation.

Criteria Softr Noloco
User Roles & Permissions Uses row-level security and basic visibility settings. Easy to configure for client-based access or small teams. Offers advanced access control with custom user roles, groups, and approval workflows—ideal for complex team structures.
Verdict: Noloco is better for teams with multiple user levels. Softr works well for simple client segmentation.

4. Design & Customization

Softr

You get a polished, modern UI with minimal effort. Choose from 100+ templates and quickly publish a clean interface. The downside? Limited design flexibility beyond blocks.

Noloco

Noloco gives you complete control over layout, navigation, and components. It’s more suited to teams building professional, branded internal tools.

Verdict: Softr is great for fast and attractive setups. Noloco is better if design precision matters.

Criteria Softr Noloco
Design & Customization Offers a clean, modern UI with 100+ templates. Quick to launch, but design options are limited to prebuilt blocks. Provides full control over layout, styling, and navigation—ideal for detailed design and branded internal tools.
Verdict: Softr is great for fast and attractive setups. Noloco is better if design precision matters.

5. Performance and Scalability

Softr

Excellent for lightweight apps and MVPs. However, being limited to Airtable’s API means performance bottlenecks can arise with high-volume users or data.

Noloco

Better for growing businesses or apps with heavy logic. It handles large datasets efficiently and offers SQL integration for scale.

Verdict: Noloco is made to scale. Softr is ideal for leaner, early-stage products.

Criteria Softr Noloco
Performance and Scalability Excellent for lightweight apps and MVPs. Some performance issues may arise due to reliance on Airtable's API for high-volume use. Built to handle complex logic and large datasets efficiently. SQL integration and better backend control support growth.
Verdict: Noloco is made to scale. Softr is ideal for leaner, early-stage products.

6. Pricing Breakdown

Platform Free Plan Paid Plans Notes
Softr From $29/mo Free plan includes limited branding and record count
Noloco 14-day trial From $49/mo Pricing scales based on users, data records, and integrations
Verdict: Softr is cheaper and ideal for beginners. Noloco offers more value for growing teams.

Verdict: Softr is cheaper and ideal for beginners. Noloco offers more value for growing teams.

Feel free to check the official pricing pages for each tool:

7. Use Case Examples

Choose Softr if: Choose Noloco if:
You’re building a simple client portal or MVP You’re building a custom internal CRM or ops tool
You prefer templates and fast setup You want total control over data and UI
You work primarily with Airtable or Google Sheets You need SQL support or advanced workflows
You want a budget-friendly no-code solution You’re scaling a business and need performance

Bonus Tip: Try Both

  • Both offer free plans or trials,  the best way to decide is to build something small in both
  • You might even use Softr for public-facing portals and Noloco for internal ops

If Noloco has caught your interest you can more about it in our extensive article series:

Conclusion: Which One Should You Choose?

  • Choose Softr if:
    • You’re just starting out and need fast, beautiful results
    • You’re working primarily with Airtable or Google Sheets
    • You prefer simplicity and low pricing over granular control

  • Choose Noloco if:
    • You need advanced data handling or user role features
    • You plan to scale or use SQL for deeper backends
    • You're building operational tools that support business processes

Need a starting point?

Join us and be part of an increasing number of builders, makers, and entrepreneurs who turn ideas into reality without coding. Your next partnership, solution, or innovation could be just one conversation away.